Marinov Stefan. The thorny way of truth. Part 09

International Publishers East-West, 1991. — 328 p.The ninth part of the collection of documents THE THORNY WAY OF TRUTH (TWT) ist dedicated to the perpetuum mobile IL NICOLINO Dl VENETO (VENETIN COLIU) which was discovered and developed by the troika Cavalli, Vianello and Marinov. VENETIN COLIU has many common features with Marinov's MAMIN COLIU but there is the following substantial difference:
MAMIN COLIU is a generator without electromagnetic braking (zero Lenz effect), while VENETIN COLIU is a generator with electromagnetic acceleration (anti-Lenz effect), i.e., when electric power is extracted from MAMIN COLIU the mechanical power needed for its rotation remains the same, while in VENETIN COLIU this mechanical power decreases. Meanwhile.
when extracting electric power from a conventional generator, the mechanical power needed for its rotation increases (normal Lenz effect). The appearance of the anti-Lenz effect in VENETIN COLIU can be explained by every child who has heard that the alternating current in a coil appears with a certain time retardation after the applied (in the case of a generator,
Induced) tension. Indeed, every logically thinking child comes to the conclusion that the magnetic field generated by this current will brake the rotation when the current has the same direction as the tension and will accelerate the rotation when its direction is opposite. Marinov is photographed above with one of the VENETIN COLIU machines constructed in January 1991. At the present time the accelerating power is still less than the friction braking power, but there is a hope that when this volume will be published the machine will be run as a perpetuum mobile. All Marinov's physics papers published in scientific journals which have not been reprinted In previous volumes of TWT are reprinted in this volume.Scientific Papers.
The Perpetuum Mobile "Il Nicolino Di Veneto" (Venetin Coliu).
The Leningrad Dissident Conference.
Physics Letters.
Experimentum Crucis For The Proof Of The Space-Time Absoluteness.
Concerning The Experimentum Crucis For The Proof Of The.
Space-Time Absoluteness.
How To Measure The Earth's Velocity With Respect To Absolute Space.
Kantor's Second-Order Doppler-Effect Experiment.
Treated By The Absolute Space-Time Theory.
The velocity of light is direction dependent.
Velocity of light in a moving medium according to the absolute space-time theory.
The experimental verification of the absolute space-time theory.
A reliable experiment for the proof of the space-time absoluteness.
The second-order effects in the "rotating disk" experiment.
Gravitational (dynamic) time dilation according to absolute space-time theory.
A pure experiment to establish that the velocoty of light does not.
depend on the velocity of the source.
Concerning Santos' experiment to test specail relativity.
Rotating disk experiments.
The light doppler effect treated by absolute spacetime theory.
Comments on: "A criticism of the 'absolute space-time theory'".
The equivalence of Compton and Doppler effects.
The ultrasonic "coupled shutters" experiment for measurement of the Earth's absolute velocity.
A decisive experiment establishing the absolute nature of electromagnetic phenomena.
Reply to Ruderfer's comments on the Marinov papers.
The coordinate transformations of the absolute space-time theory.
A proposed experiment to measure the one-way velocity of light.
The experimental measurement of the one-way light velocity and its.
possibilities for absolute velocity measurement.
Measurement of the laboratory's absolute velocity.
Decisive experiments for the proof of the light velocity's direction dependence.
The quasi -Doppler experiment according to absolute space-time theory.
Newtonian time synchronization with the help of light signals.
Moving platform experiments.
Are phonon particles?
Contrary to Wilczynski, there is no aberration for comoving source and observer.
The quasi-Roemer and quasi-Bradly experiments according to absolute space- time theory.
The interrupted 'rotating disk' experiment.
Problems of synchronization in special relativity: A reply to G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli.
CORRESPONDENCE.
Year 1990.
Year 1991.